Background-image

When Going Gets Rough

It is in times like these that a person's character shines the most, in the moments of chaos and depression that those few spirits lift others up, transcending from the mortal world and piercing through the clouds above into God's presence. Though clouds may cast a darkness upon the land, the shadow only proves the sunshine.
Hi, I am Mark Nadal, and I am a product of the American 21st century. I live, I breathe in a time where the very structure of society breaks down individuals, pushing them to the brink of sanity and confusion, till it leaves people in chaos and destruction. I am a witness to the fall of a once great nation, and I leave you a message about the decay of a civilization. If we, the zeta generation, do not rise up and alter the course of our nation, then the only hope that remains is in the phoenix; if this be our destiny, then receive this message so that you too will not make the same mistake. We live in dire times, and we require a heroic response. But all too soundly and silently, heroes have passed into fiction. We are an invisible nation.
Such a voice is loss in the mingling meaningless crying sobs, such a voice is to justify such cries, we are generation crying, a generation dying, and no hero is arising. Amidst the chaotic sounds and confused souls screaming for somebody to care, somebody to love, a silent wake is left rippling in history. These voices must be heard, if not for their own sake, but then for the sake of those to follow.
I tread upon tears, they are the burden I have taken on, they are the cries I shall voice, a generation lost at heart. Some will scream for the unborn, I shall scream for the born. Let this weeping be heard, I shed tears for I cannot take the weight, but only God can, let my tears turn to blood and ash if I may bear these iniquities, this generation’s sin, if no one shall come, let me take them so that I may be guilty before my savior – for he has saved me once, assuredly he may save me twice. My heart trembles and weeps.
Forgive us our sins, cleanse us our iniquities, and let us not be forsaken. This generation needs a hero, and let heroes arise. Let our generation become legacy’s legends, so that they too, shall not forget. Though our age may come to an end, let the phoenix thrive, and remember us not as myth, but as Truth. We serve God, and we will His Will. That we may represent Christ, as He is a mediator to our Lord, let us be mediators to our Savior. Though darkness comes, we transcend. I hold a teardrop, timeless shed, but eternal grace I bless. Let us forget not our place, bearing our humility, as the prophets of a place, nation once so great. Our fall shall not be without a fight. Darkness may prevail for the while, but God’s light is the now. Move beyond the clouds, but forget not the trials. Forget not the Graveyard World, these bloodstained paws, give me your honest dead, to grapple with this beaming redemption, embrace it tightly, a breath away, the lighted way.
I mourn. I cry. I weep. I shed tears. For my friends, for my generation. Let me be a voice, if I may, even a hero, to bear these burdens, show the transcendental glory, breaking through the clouds of an overcast world, that happiness and joy can sustain, that these people may see. So that they too, may believe, and rejoice in the Truth. Embrace the Lighted way, a beaming crucifix. Love exists.

Love

On Love, Sex and Betrothal
            Love is totality. Love is the basis of reality, the essence of human, the meaning of philosophy. It is the expression of your life, your breath, your motion; it consumes you and intoxicates your wholeness. You can no longer be a villain, yet human, with or without love. And a hero no longer can be real without it. Love is not carnal.
                Love is no beating heart, it is a lifestyle.
                I profess Love, as God as my witness, I claim and attest to the highest ordinance of all Love, the purest and most noble, the quintessence of innocence, True Love. May words be cautious, for I no longer can believe that one can express their sentiments without being mistaken for YABFGF (Yet Another Boyfriend-Girlfriend). Thus this essay is a proposal of vindication and justification, if therefore you are only interested in this essay because you saw the word “sex” in the title, you might be too shallow for the mature topics discussed in this essay, however hopefully these words have spited you into reading it just because, and don’t worry, you’ll get to eat your cake too. This essay, however, shall be unique from my other essays, being addressed in a much more casual and personal way.
                First off for fun and spite, I want to mess with your brain to get you thinking differently. The big topic of “Sex before Marriage”, the Biblical answer is actually “have sex before marriage.” Wait, hear my flawed-argument before you judge me. Jesus said, “You have heard that the ancients were told, ‘You shall not commit murder’ and ‘Whoever commits murder shall be liable to the court.’ “But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court” as well as “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery ’; but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” Basically, it is making it very clear that what we think and feel are just as important as what we do. So here’s the dilemma, a man and a woman are clearly not going to get married unless they are thinking they will have sex, or, well, if they aren’t thinking about that, I’m sure they’ll be very shocked, surprised and even slightly dismayed about what is involved in reproducing, but I’m sure they’ll be very cute and loyal to each other anyways. Anyway, if what we think is of as sinful or righteous consequences as Jesus implies, then the man and the woman have already had sex many times and way before they are married, though it just may not be literal. Well, ahem, I assume you see the flaw in my argument, but, I think it is an interesting thought to think through to get your mind in gear. More will be said on this topic later on.
 
                On Love.
                Now for the good stuff, that’s right, the theological philosophical discourse on Love, it is much better than talking about sex. The big question today is, “What is Love?” While the answer is pretty logical and simple, our society is so messed up that it is a rather heart-wrenching and complicatedly confusing topic. So we need to start with the basics. Love is not a mushy-feely good emotion. Though do note, love is a catalyst for mushy-feely good emotions; however it is not the only catalyst for such emotional euphoria, people can also get such sensations by an electric jolt from an electrode implanted through your skull. Love instead is a lifestyle. It is a fundamental philosophy, a perspective on reality. A state of being, not an act of doing.
 
                                The First Love.
                                First Love is an interesting phenomenon, for most it usually is recounted as a silly senseless foolish crush from emotions and hormone, and typically is full of sappy romantic and idealistic notions that suddenly get slapped in your face and rejected when you discover that life and reality is a little bit more cold than you had originally presumed at such a young age. And so people grow up and spend years getting over it. Naturally and consequently, while most people put on the happy face and talk about how silly and naive they were, the actual affects on the person are of very traumatic nature to the character as an individual. Love honestly is the deepest and most personal aspect to a person, and because of that their first love has a profound impact on their life, consciously or subconsciously. I presume many people even to this day often have a lingering question “what if?” in the back of their mind of their memories. Perhaps even more devastating to a person isn’t perhaps the harsh slap or rejection, but more the dream smashing, hope dashing realization that their first love wasn’t who they had dreamt and thought about, that they weren’t so ideal or perfect but disgustingly human, mortal, sinful, imperfect and foolish. Such a charactering-altering moment is crucially defining to an individual; love, the most important component to their life, has suddenly been smashed to tiny bits and pieces, this does a massive toll on a human psyche and thus their ability to grow up, mature, and trust other people later. In essence, the devastation of the first love often ruins an individual or brings them a great deal of pain and anguish.
                                Rewind. We missed it entirely; the most obvious connection in existence has been entirely brought into such disillusionment in our culture that people don’t even notice it. What is the phenomenon of the First Love? Why is it so prevalent? Why does it impact an individual so much? How exactly does Love in the first place trigger such a fundamental and profound effect on the very core psyche and character of a person? What is the big deal?
                                We’re human. And humans love. Every human at one point has loved, and the way that others react and respond to this love often shapes the person into who they are. But even this still doesn’t answer the question, a question so rudimentary that is not even needed to be asked. Why do we love in the first place? Why is love a universally defining aspect to humans? Why are we, an intelligent and civilized species, not like the ordinary animals through which a good humping job is all that is needed for life and reproduction? Why are humans not simply like animals whom which do not express such vivid portrayals of love? Why do we love?
                                At this point, we need some prerequisites. Either a fundamental assumption about the existence of God and his Divine and Holy, Pure, Noble, Infinite, Good, Just, Merciful, Autonomous, Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent, Personal, Loving and Creative and nature or a thorough understanding and discourse in reason, logic, philosophy and theology that ultimately conclusively require such an Being to exist. If you have a problem with the existence of such a being I recommend reading other essays written by myself and then personally talking to me and I will prove to you the absolute framework in this universe that necessarily needs such an Entity, so if you are one of those people you need to stop reading this essay or else its progression won’t make any sense.
                                …because of that, we therefore can see why God created such a creature, a Human Being, made in His image, creating a creature that has a free will, to see if of their own volition, they will love God back. A creature that does not have a will of its own, an autonomy, would robotically and automatically ‘love’ God back, because it is the most logical and reasonable thing to do (namely, getting on the good side of the Creator of Everything is usually the best choice, I mean, you know, compared to the alternatives). However, there is no glory in that, there is no praise, and truly it is not even ‘love’ at all if it is script, a program. A sculptor, though sculpting a man bowing down to the sculptor, receives no True glory, love, affection, honor, adoration, or praise from the sculpted man, the figure still is a harsh and cold block of marble. Therefore, the existence of free will is an absolute necessity for a thing to Truly Love back. Thus, God made mankind in His own image, the Image of God, and then blessed man with paradise. God did absolutely everything of the most wonderful and cherishable nature, God loved man. Now, would man love God back? Would man do the most obvious, most reasonable, most wonderful thing, and praise God, love God, and adore God?
                                                The First Lovers. Now that we know why we love, perhaps understanding the First Lovers will give us a better answer to the First Love Phenomenon and what Love itself is. At this point, what love is should come quite naturally since we’ve established all the basics leading up to it. Love is an act of volition, or otherwise a state of being, it is a decisive existence and a fundamental defining characteristic of the principles of an individual, it is a conscious choice made not of selfish ambition but for a purposes of a higher, greater, nobler quality and character. Love is something you are, every moment. Love is a lifestyle.
                                                Through this we can see the beauty of the story of Adam and Eve, regardless if it is literal or allegorical, debating if it is an actual timespace event or a metaphysical story is the greatest disgrace to one of the world’s most insightful, brilliant, transcendent and wise explanation of the most fundamental issue of a Human Being. The story of Adam and Eve is also quite frankly the story of all of us, too. We live in a material world and we can enjoy the pleasures and sensations of such a beautiful creation, we are blessed by God, we now have that imminent option: do we love God back? If we truly do, we shall not eat of the “forbidden fruit.” If we examine every single law that God has revealed, we shall discover that absolutely every single one has a reason behind it, usually that reason is actually for the sake of the individual and not for and of God. But “do not eat this fruit, I forbid you” has no reason as to why, but simply a testament of your Love, a conscious, decisive choice to be loyal, to worship, praise, adore and Love God back for absolutely no reason other than a simple act of volition, a state of being. To Love, is to do the unreasonable, not in attempts to do the foolish, but to prove your commitment.
                                                This is what Love is all about, and the results of such a state of being, an existence, a lifestyle, is an infinite, unreasonable, surplus of joy and happiness. True Love is the greatest thing to strive for. But now, let us reexamine the First Lovers, as is renown, they failed. And in an epic tragedy, we read as Adam, though knowing the good and evil of the consequences of his choices, decides to ignore and rebel against the Creator of the Universe and be cursed with Eve. Ironically, his choice actually was an act of Love, being so thoroughly committed to Eve that he revolted against God, the one who loved him first, and loved him so much He even created Eve for Adam to love as well.
                                                Do you see it? Did you miss it? It is that simple, it is that profound. God is your first love, He is your first lover. He explains his Love by loving on you, namely, he created a companion, that way Adam had a physical, tangible source and understanding of God’s love, just in case you are not good with the abstract-fluffy-platonic-form-in-the-sky type of philosophy and fuzzy love, guess what, he created a real world concrete example to help you understand how much God loves you, and yes, that real world concrete example is sizzling hot and sexy, and foxy all over. God has supplied you with both the ideal and the real.
                                Therefore, back on First Loves in general, here is the problematic situation. People easily confuse the ideal, that romantic, sappy, beautiful perfection, with the person themselves, the real concrete example. Your First Love is God. And God reveals his beauty, his character to you through a person. This person is just as fallen and sinful as Eve, and you are now role-playing the Adam part. You now have the choice, to Love God, have paradise, be blessed with your hot spouse, and have the most amazing relationship, a relationship that is incredible because God, the Creator of the Universe and your First Love is the instigator of your relationship; He is the bond between you. Therefore I will boldly state, you can never Truly Love another individual unless you have Truly Loved God first. And because you have found True Love with God, He blesses and loves you back in a manifold of ways, greatest of all, with a companion whom infinitely more will show you the even deeper beauty of God as they Love you back just as both of you Love God back as well.
                There is no Love sweeter than this, no Love greater than this, none as beautiful, as True, as fulfilling, as sexy.
 
                On Sex and Betrothal
                If you can Love like this, then Heaven, God wants you to create mini-yous and mini-yourhotspouse. And Heaven, the amount of tantalizing pleasure the Philosopher gets out of having his perfect ideal abstract philosophical concept of Love should also have its equally pleasurable real-world concrete: hot steamy sex. Heaven yes, I just compared Philosophy with intercourse, get over it. Wow, and you thought giving you a thinking-exercise about “Sex before Marriage” was messing with your brain, look at the mess you are in now. But speaking of which, and now getting back on topic, I mentioned there would be more to say on “Sex before Marriage”.
                Actually, now taking the issue in its own categorical right, “Betrothal”, there are some interesting things to be said. First off, the word choice, since “marriage” is going under such legal scrutiny and government control I’ve decided it is wise to entirely avoid such a now catastrophic term. Because of this, the beautiful word “wedding” will be used to refer to the traditional public declaration to your community of your commitments. But prior to even this, I shall use the word “Betrothal” to express what could be considered as the “engagement”, but fundamentally it roots back to the moment where the two individuals privately declare fidelity to each other.
                Now here is an issue of notary concern. In this society and culture people do get married, as well as divorced, but often even prior to that they have a whole slew of boyfriends or girlfriends or maybe even both. Dating is rampart with physical aggression and even sexual experimentation. This is absolutely wrong.
                Why?
                Good question. Love is a state of being, an act of volition, and a decisive commitment, it is principled and expresses fidelity, it is loyal and faithful. Now, what is Loving? Or making love? Just as it has very thoroughly gone through how fundamental and essential Love is to a human being, this next part should be even more universally understood. Watch these two beautiful worlds merge. Sexual intercourse is by far and wide the most desired thing in the world, more than gold and power, if they average that 3 children are born every second imagine how many people are getting it on every second, having sex is like breathing air. The collision of two humans, in their bodily forms, the Vessel and the Temple of the Lord, is the most beautiful expression of Love, fore mostly because of the amount of volumetric pleasure, joy and happiness it brings to the individuals. Two Lovers, in the True since of Love, want to Love on each other just as God loves on us, these two souls want to please and bring as much happiness and joy to each other as they possibly can. Sexual intimacy is the greatest possible expression of love that humans are capable of.
                True commitment, true fidelity, True Love is exactly what it claims to be. Therefore such physical aggression and sexual promiscuousness is the most damaging, unloyal and unfaithful thing that one can do prior to Betrothal. True Love is a state of being, which is timeless, it is something that you are every moment, regardless if you have met your Beloved or not, from the moment of conscious awareness to the moment you die, it is an unfaltering state of being, an existence, a lifestyle. Just as you do not have an extra life to “practice” living, you do not have an extra love life, prior to your beloved, to “practice” loving, such attempts and experimentation are as consequentially damaging to an individual as if one lived their life as an experiment to cast it away to death. Interestingly enough, in a materialistic culture you increasingly see people living out such lives. Willingly sacrificing oneself, as if a lab rat, and ostentatiously attempting to define this as “practice” is unwise and a feeble excuse just to try and experience the physical sensations without the True Love, Betrothed, Timeless, Life Long commitment, the fidelity.
                This is the beauty of Betrothal, it is not a pathetic excuse of dating, or yet another boyfriend-girlfriend, or even courting. It is a relationship in its most Godly, purest, sexiest, most beautiful and noble potential, it is True Love. Inside of this topic, I perhaps have an interesting addition to the topic of “Sex before Marriage”. Honestly, at this moment of Betrothal, this beautiful expression of True Love and Eternal Fidelity, this is the defining moment where sexual relation arises, sexual unity is simply the physical counterpart to the spiritual unity, the commitment of volitions, the Betrothal. Sexual intimacy cannot come into existence until one is Betrothed; sexual intercourse is the natural consequence of betrothal. One cannot have sexual relations unless they are betrothed and they cannot have such intimacy with anyone other than their Beloved. Betrothal and sex are inextricably connected, and cannot be separated. This beautiful eternal moment, in the presence of God, is what I truly see as the defining moment. However, God also blesses and provides people with a community, and to do things in the proper celebratory and ceremonial way, which humans have a very strong tendency for, traditionally the custom is to wait to have intercourse until you’ve made the public vow to God and your spouse in front of a community, so then you can have a ball of a time feasting and drinking and dancing and then getting it on, after the wedding. Thus, a wedding is really only the public celebration and traditional ceremony of the Betrothal. I foresee waiting until then is a much more proper and viable time. Betrothed couples are a unit in society, and therefore should act responsibly, loyally, respectfully to their community.
                Beautiful. That is what the unity is. Where two souls collide, the deepest, purest affection. Innocence is not lost, it is gained. The leaping spark between the lovers, such sensations of fire and tingling, the irresistible chemistry, the bond of God. The motion towards each other, nay, as they approach one another they approach their Father, such pursuit is of the most darling expressions, and innocence is multiplied. The progression towards sexual sensation is the gain of innocence. The ultimate unity of the two bodies, Holy Temples of the Lord, forming one flesh is as beautiful of a parallel to us uniting with Christ as his Holy Bride. Salvation, and the blessing of Paradise. Intercourse and the pleasure of stimulation. Heaven and its beauty. Heavenly bodies in motion with each other. A glimpse at the face of God. The ultimate happiness and warmth in each others arms. Worship unto Him, the most beautiful glory and praise.
                True Love. Eternal Fidelity.
 
Vindication. Christ in a Rose, Swanson. Justification.

Zero

Of [Numbers], [Dimensions], and The Universe
by ©: Mark Nadal
The mathematical discrimination against zero has caused an obstruction to man’s scientific understanding of the universe. An affirmative action is necessary in order to counter this detrimental cause. This trilogy essay, thuswise written, intends to restore the scientific and mathematical application of operations on the ZERO number, and duly note the important ideals that it represents through first correcting the exception in Numbers, then explaining its importance in Dimensions and finally how it applies to The Universe.
 
On Numbers
 
The Definition.
The numerical symbol “0” represents the known English word “zero” which has a meaning of “”, however, “” can also be referred to as “Nothing”, “Null”, “Nil”, “Empty”. Aptly put in a literal fashion: “0=”, or otherwise “0=0”, “0=’Nothing’”. Zero, is a complicated concept to comprehend, as any representation of Nothing is obviously something, the representative does a poor job reflecting the attributes and characteristic of Nothing. So keep in mind that the words above listed all are symbolic representation of . However, the previous statement does not make sense without proper words: “…representation of nothing.”
 
            The Crisis.
Mathematicians have mistakenly discriminated against zero because of its unique property, this however is subsequently dangerous because once we disallow, declare illegal, reject, and ignore the unique attributes of zero, we are less inclined to understand all that it represents and can formulate. The cause is not without reason, however; yet, in many practical ways, making particular operations involving zero “un-desired” is wise (these reasons will be addressed later). But making it illegal and disallowed is foolish for the important reasons of the philosophical answers that the nature of zero and its operations has to offer.
 
            The Basis.
The elemental basis for numerous operations is addition. Subtraction is only the addition of the inverse of the number. Multiplication is only the addition of the number for a specified variable times. Division is the inverse of multiplication, which is based on addition. Exponent are based on multiplying (which is rooted in addition) a number for a specified variable times. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that Addition is the Mother of Operations; other operations are shortcuts through a rather lengthy process of addition.
 
            The Binary.
Technically, only two states exist: 0 and 1, which is also commonly represented as FALSE and TRUE, or otherwise Nothing and Something. Other numbers, like 2 and 3 or 56 are just representations of 1+1, 1+1+1, (I’ll spare you 56, as I assume you are intelligent and understand the point).
 
For the following, as commonly used in computer science, “!” will mean “not” or “no”.
 
0 = 0 (Zero Equals Zero)
0 != 1 (Zero Not Equal to One)
0 = !1 (Zero Equals Not One)
1 = 1 (One Equals One)
1 != 0 (One Not Equal to Zero)
1 = !0 (One Equals Not Zero)
 
FALSE = FALSE
FALSE != TRUE
FALSE = !TRUE
TRUE = TRUE
TRUE != FALSE
TRUE = !FALSE
 
Nothing = Nothing (Nothing Equals Nothing)
Nothing != Something (Nothing does Not Equal Something)
Nothing = !Something (Nothing is Equal to No Something)
Something = Something (Something Equals Something)
Something != Nothing (Something does Not Equals Nothing)
Something = !Nothing (Something Equals No Nothing)
 
On the last one, notice the use of a double negative. In fact, “Nothing” is “no thing”, which could be represented as !thing, and “Something” could be just ‘thing’. Something that exists is the same as if there were no non existent things, because the existence of an object categorically denies nothingness, as something does in fact exist. It is black and white.
 
            The Proposition.
x/0 = 0
 
1.      By Law. Numerous laws exist in mathematics, because that is the scientific and absolute nature of it. These laws were not created, they were discovered; these laws were not conceived, they were revealed. These laws are universal and apply to all numbers. Making an exception for zero, so that it is illegal, is absolutely un-scientific and contrary to the very nature of mathematics. In fact, that is why it is called an “exception”, it is making an exception of the law of mathematics. This is significant because if we accept the exception, that means we have immediately departed from mathematics – we are no longer performing math. It is completely contrary to any kind of logical sense to use math while not performing it.
 
Inverse Law of Multiplication and Division: If x*b=a then a/b=x
Multiplication Law of Zero: If x*0=0
 
Therefor:
 
Division Law of Zero: If x/0=0
This is true because of the mathematical relationship between multiplication and division; in division, if a or b happens to be zero then the x will be zero.
On top of the inverse relationship, there is also a commutative law of multiplication. Using “|” to depict “either, if not already chosen” (x*b=a then a/b=x) + (x*b = b*x) = (x|b*x|b=a then a/x|b=x|b). Stating that 0/5=0, but then saying 5/0=Illegal contradicts the mechanics of the commutative law.
These are mandatory laws and no mathematician can ignore them without denying his profession.
 
Examples:
      2*3=6, 6/3=2
(1+1)*(1+1+1)=(1+1+1+1+1+1), (1+1+1+1+1+1)/(1+1+1)=(1+1)
 
      0*5=0, 0/5=0 (legal)
0*(1+1+1+1+1)=0, 0/(1+1+1+1+1)=0 [legal]
 
      5*0=0, 5/0=0 (“illegal”)
(1+1+1+1+1+)*0=0, (1+1+1+1+1+)/0=0 [“illegal”]
(This last example also illustrates a violation of the commutative law if the preceding example is true)
 
2.      By Reason. All operations other than division are defined with zero, it is illogical to leave a critical operand left out as being illegal, especially when it is already defined by the commutative law and is also required by the inverse relationship law. It is unreasonable to avoid mathematics while performing mathematics.
 
Additionally, if all numbers can be represented by either 0 or 1, and 1 is fully defined and its properties and attributes are accurately understood, making particular important properties of zero be illegal is detrimental to the mechanics of mathematics.
 
3.      By Mathematics. Division can be read as, “How many‘b’s go inside of ‘a’?” the answer x is the amount.
10/1 = How many Ones are in Ten? = 10 = (1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1)
10/5 = How many Fives are in Ten? = 2 = (5 + 5)
10/10 = How many Tens are in Ten? = 1 = (10)
 
Thus, it is mathematically accurate to state that No Nothings go into Something (see Binary Examples). The following example will be repeated in numerous different ways so the understanding between the literal and figurative perspectives of Zero makes adequate sense.
5/0 = How many Zeros are in Five? = None = ()
5/0 = How many Zeros are in Five? = Null = (Empty)
5/0 = How many Zeros are in Five? = Nil = (None)
5/0 = How many Zeros are in Five? = 0 = (Nil)
5/0 = How many Zeros are in Five? = Empty = (0)
5/0 = How many Zeros are in Five? = = ()
It is true to state that there are 0 “0”s in Five; there are NO “0”s in Five. The existence of Something empirically denies Nothingness; Something and Nothing are mutually exclusive. It is correct to state that there are 0 (the figurative amount) of “0”s (the literal meaning). Due to the figurative and literal meaning of zero, understanding the division expression is easier to comprehend if it is substituted with synonyms – as the previous example illustrated.
 
The following test will visually represent the concept.
1+1+1+1+1=5 [TRUE] [FALSE]
Does the zero “0” character appear anywhere in the following: “1+1+1+1+1”? [YES] [NO]
 
It is stated, that if division by zero was legal then it would be undefined because one can add any number of Zeros to Zero and it would still be Zero.
It is true that: 0+0+0+0+0+…=0. In fact: x+0=x, this is the Identity Property of Addition with Zero (same law applies to its inverse, subtraction).
 
This Identity Property of Addition with Zero reflects why it would not be undefined. The Identity Property of Addition with Zero states that “Any number + 0 is the same number.” The reason why is best illustrated by working through it mathematically:
 
The Opponent:
5+0=5, 5+0+0=5, 5+0+0+0+…=5
Therefore 5/0 would mean there is an undefined (or infinite) amount of “0”s in 5.
 
The Mathematics:
((5+0) = 5) = 5
This is a more accurate description of what happens, it is the SUM of 5 and 0 that equals 5, before you continue to the next operation you first perform the operation prior to it (in the order of the operations themselves, naturally).
(1+1+1+1+1)+0=1+1+1+1+1
1+1+1+1+1=1+1+1+1+1
That way, by the time you divide 5 into 0, 5 = 1+1+1+1+1, not 1+1+1+1+1+0+0+…, because you have already performed the identity test and it now equals itself which is 5 (or 1+1+1+1+1).
 
The conclusion that x/0=Undefined is mathematically faulty, as it is based on performing the operation prior to performing the operations within the grouping symbols (which take higher precedent).
Second, even while ignoring the hierarchy, adding an undefined amount of zeros to the number is not specified in the formula, meaning that the “answer” they draw is only based on tampering with the original formula to modify its behavior – which naturally results in a changed formula and thus an inaccurate depiction of the first.
The conclusion that x/0=Undefined is incorrect because it violates the law of Operational Hierarchies as well as expressly corrupts the original formula.
_______________________________________
0/0 = x
The reason why 0/0=x is a conclusion based on the combination of numerous mathematical laws.
 
If x/0=0
But if x/x=1
Then 0/0={0,1}
 
However x*b=a then a/b=x
In multiplication: if a or b or x = 0
            (For purpose of clarity, assume a = 0)
Then Multiplication Property of Zero applies. x or b or x and b = 0
(For purpose, let: x != 0, then b=0)
            Then in division: (a/b) 0/0=x
Then 0/0={…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}
 
More simply:
Because x*b=a then a/b=x, if x*0=0, then 0/0=x.
Then 0/0={…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}
 
Examples:
            For x*b=a and a/b=x
1.      x = 0
b = 0
a = 0
 
0*0=0
0/0=0
 
2.      x = 0
a = 0
b = {…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}
 
0*{…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}=0
0/{…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}=0
 
3.      b = 0
a = 0
x = {…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}
 
{…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}*0=0
0/0={…-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5…}
 
 
4.      x = 0
b = 5
a = 0
 
0*5=0
0/5=0
 
5.      x = 2
a = 0
b = 0

2*0=0

0/0=2
 
6.      x = 0
a = 0
b = 0

0*0=0
0/0=0

 
7.      x = -5
b = 0
a = 0

-5*0=0
0/0=-5

 
8.      x = -5
b = 2
a = -10

-5*2=-10
-10/2=-5

 
_______________________________________
 
            Origin of the Crisis.
Mathematics is appreciated because of its rigid, absolute framework. Two plus two will always equal Four, all numbers work in an orderly, perfected fashion. There are many good reasons why division by zero is undesired, however these are reasons that can be easily resolved.
1.      Relativism. If 0/0 can be equated to anything then mathematics becomes completely meaningless, 0/0 = 0/0 could be substituted for 6 = 22. Mathematics becomes devoid of all meaning if 0/0 can be equated to anything.

This is mathematically false because it ignores the principle that “any operation may be performed only if it is done on both sides of an equation.” Mathematically, pairs of the operation 0/0 must have the same result for both sides, and naturally, 0/0 cannot be used to violate mathematical laws.

2.      Computation. For practical purposes, if 0/0 can equate to any answer, this would expand into infinity, and a processing machine would get stuck in an infinite loop.

This is true, since a machine operates in a linear fashion it is unable to analyze complex abstractions (namely, infinity) unlike the human counterpart which can. In this situation since a randomly selected number could give rise to an unequated and thus false solution, the best practical answer is to prompt the human for input (since, currently, the human already is prompted with a supposed error message), if that input is available then the computer can finish the equation, however if not then the process should be terminated so a possible inaccuracy is not generated.

(Note from author: just as randomness, being an abstraction like infinity, cannot be calculated by a machine, humans have developed clever algorithms that accurately generate pseudo-random numbers. With this in mind, I speculate that it is not too tedious of an application that human wit cannot overcome and algorithmically produce accurate pseudo-0/0 numbers. This, I foresee, as the best alternative.)

 
 
The Importance of Being 0/0.
The applications of 0/0 is the greatest driving force to the necessity of abolishing the unmathematical exception. Here listed is only the beginning of numerous applications that prove important to the unifying structure of math. In fact, the results of some of these are so significant that they will further explained in the following essays Dimensions and The Universe. While at first these unifying results may not seem significant, this is because it explains quite common concepts that are already understood, what is important is to see how 0/0 is actually the application that defines these concepts. It is revolutionary to think that 0/0 is used all the time, yet it has been declared as meaningless, unimportant and illegal. Humans instinctively think in 0/0 and they are surrounded by 0/0, 0/0 is an important property that defines not only this world but also beyond. Now credit is given where it is due.

1.      Variables. Variables are used all the time in real world mathematics, all formulas consist of variables, from F=M*A to C2 + B2 = C2. But until now, variables themselves could never be a mathematical expression. Variables can now relate to distinct processes of 0/0, just as a variable is a placeholder, so is 0/0. F=M*A actually is (0/0)=(0/0)*(0/0), as is the nature of formulas, if you select an answer for two of the “0/0”s, then you will immediately have the answer to the third. As is accustomed, you cannot manually ascribe all three variables, because a formula is used to solve for one of them.

The existence of 0/0 allows for variables to be mathematically defined, this highlights the unifying nature of mathematics.

2.      Randomness. Any randomly selected number can also be identified in 0/0 and since 0/0 can be a placeholder for any unknown specified number it can namely be equated to randomness.

3.      Infinity. Since 0/0 can express any number, 0/0 is the mathematical definition of infinity, since its solution includes all conceivable and inconceivable answers.

4.      Unity Point Between Concretes and Abstracts. Realistically, numbers are finite, because we live in a physical (and thus finite) world. There are only 10 fingers and 10 toes on your hands and feet, the numbers 37 and 2,691 do not exist because you cannot exceed past a count of 20. There is a discrete amount of pages in a book, and a number beyond that does not exist for that object. Yet, theoretically we know that these numbers do exist, we know that if we can add up all of our fingers, we can always find a new number after that. As mentioned prior to this, we can hypothetically count into infinity. Because of this, 0/0 is the unity point between discrete and continuous numbers, it explains how in a world that has absolute, finite, integral values that undeterminable, infinite, continuous values are also possible. In other words, 0/0 expresses the relationship between concrete realities and abstract ideas, which subsequently explains how a human mind contrives such complexity.

Example: 0/0 explains the interaction between the Platonic form of a chair and physical chair itself. The physical chair expresses the discrete existence of a tangible, absolute object which consequently results in a ubiquitous, infinitely generic form that is what defines a chair as a chair. The real is what allows us to comprehend the abstract, but it is the abstract that allows us to define the real, this relationship is united because of 0/0.

5.      Dimensions. Continue to the second essay. Note: This essay will also address the issue of reaching infinity as you graph towards dividing a number by zero.

6.      The Universe. Continue to the third essay.

7.      Beyond. 0/0 is such a defining attribute that its application surpasses that which is listed in this essay; namely 0/0, as its nature is unexhaustive, this list is not exhausted. Since mathematics is something that is superfluous to any one particular thing and can be applied to an exceedingly diverse amount of topics, whether logic or concretes or abstracts, it would be unwise to ever state that its case is closed.

8.      God. Finally, 0/0 is a mathematical operation that can accurately describe the infinite attributes of God himself, it is fascinating to realize that the mastermind who constructed these mathematical, scientific and logical laws, which are absolute themselves, all reflect the nature of their Divine Creator.
This essay was originally published August 26th, 2007 on my older blog.